NCAABBMatchup
#10 seed
Texas A&M
Final
57-88
#2 seed
Houston
Post-Game Review
Texas A&M (+87.7 scoring margin) played Houston (+77.1 scoring margin). The projected total was 82 points; the actual total was 145. Houston held statistical advantages in 2 of 3 key categories.
•Texas A&M averaged 10.6 more points per game this season, holding a significant offensive advantage coming in.
•Texas A&M averaged 10.8 turnovers per game this season. Houston's ability to force mistakes was a factor.
Result
Houston defeated Texas A&M 88-57 in a dominant performance.
B
Texas A&M GradeC
Houston GradeB
Texas A&M Grade46%
vs
45%
C
Houston GradeTournament Context
South Region — 2nd RoundPaycom Center
10Texas A&M
vsHouston2
Adjusted EfficiencyTexas A&M#39 Eff.Houston#5 Eff.
Texas A&M#39 Eff.Adj. Offense119.6
Adj. Defense101.4
Houston#5 Eff.Adj. Offense124.9
Adj. Defense91.9
Pace & Efficiency
Expected Pace82.4Up-Tempo
Texas A&M+87.7Scoring Margin
Houston+77.1Scoring Margin
Offense87.7 PPG
Offense77.1 PPG
DefenseN/A Opp PPG
DefenseN/A Opp PPG
Shooting & Box Score
45.8%FG%45.0%
36.2%3P%34.9%
73.7%FT%77.2%
37.7RPG36.6
18.1APG14.7
10.8TOV8.5
Total Projection
Projected Total164.9
Texas A&M: 87.7Houston: 77.1
No DK total line available
Key Matchup Factors
Texas A&M2 advantages
1 advantageHouston
87.7 PPG
Scoring Advantage
77.1 PPG
10.8 TOV/G
Ball Security
8.5 TOV/G
18.1 APG
Ball Movement
14.7 APG
Statistical Comparison
Texas A&MHouston
87.7
PPG77.1
0.0
Opp PPG0.0
37.7
RPG36.6
18.1
APG14.7
45.8%
FG%45.0%
36.2%
3P%34.9%
73.7%
FT%77.2%
8.1
SPG7.7
3.2
BPG3.9
10.8
TOV8.5
Texas A&M
Strengths
Full Team Profile Elite scoring offense
Excellent ball movement
Disruptive with steals