Bobby'sSports Analytics · Stats & research
Boosts 🎯
Home
Picks & tools
Facts
Search
Research
Lines
College FB
Compare
💸 Refer
Bobby's Sports Analytics — Stats, facts & research
LearnRefer & EarnMy RecordDiscordTwitter

Bobby's Sports Analytics publishes sports statistics and analysis for informational purposes only. Nothing here is a prediction of results or a recommendation to wager. Must be 21+ (18+ where permitted by law). Please play responsibly.

Problem gambling? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER — free, confidential, 24/7 — or visit ncpgambling.org.

Terms of Service·Disclaimer·Responsible Play

TodayStatsFantasyModelsMarkets

Research

We publish what we tested

Most sites selling picks won't tell you when a market is already priced correctly. We backtest our own angles against the close, and we say so either way.

AllMLBNFLNBAWNBA
Live studiesMarket backtestsWritten studiesTrack recordDaily stats

Live studies

Recomputed from our game logs · every player measured against their own baseline

MLBNo hot hand

Is the hot hand real?

When a hitter is on a hitting streak, is he more likely to get a hit the next day than he normally would be?

−2.8 pts
8+ game streaks vs the hitter's own rate
62.4%
vs 61.5%
After 0-fer
62.7%
vs 62.7%
1-2 streak
63.2%
vs 64.2%
3-4 streak
63.8%
vs 65.4%
5-7 streak
64.6%
vs 67.4%
8+ streak
Actual hit rateExpected from own season rateaxis starts at 54.8%

Hitters riding 8+ game streaks got a hit in 64.6% of their next games — which sounds hot, until you compare each one to his own season rate: they were expected to hit in 67.4%. The streak adds nothing (−2.8 pts, z = -1.9). The raw number is high because good hitters are the ones who build streaks.

How we measured it · 39,719 games · 432 hitters · 2026▾

Every 2026 start (3+ PA) by hitters with 30+ such games. For each game we record the streak he entered it on, and his expected hit rate = his season hit-game rate with that game left out. Streaks in a finite season slightly favor 'cold' results even with no real effect (Miller & Sanjurjo, 2018), so small negative gaps are expected by chance.

MLBReal, but small

How much is home field worth to hitters?

Do hitters actually hit better at home, and by how much?

+.007
home batting average edge
HomeAway
Batting avg.247.240
HR per 600 PA18.518.0
Strikeout rate21.7%22.8%
Walk rate8.9%8.5%

League-wide, hitters bat .247 at home and .240 on the road (z = 3.2), strike out less (21.7% vs 22.8%) and walk more. Over 600 plate appearances that's about 0.5 extra home runs — real, but a rounding error next to who the hitter is.

How we measured it · 184,536 plate appearances · 2026▾

Every 2026 plate appearance in our game logs, split by whether the hitter's team was home.

MLBNo September fade

Does hitting fade in September?

As a long season wears on, do hitters get worse in the final month compared to their own year?

−0.4 pts
September hit-rate vs own season average
46.9%
Mar
50.5%
Apr
49.6%
May
51.5%
Jun
50.0%
Jul
50.0%
Aug
49.6%
Sep
42.1%
Oct
Hit-rate vs own season average (shifted to positive for display)axis starts at 32.5%

Comparing each qualified hitter's hit-rate in every month to his own season rate, September comes in at −0.4 points (z = -0.6) across 4,587 games. Mar: −3.1, Apr: +0.5, May: −0.4, Jun: +1.5, Jul: +0.0, Aug: −0.0, Sep: −0.4, Oct: −7.9. None of the months stand out as a real, sustained fade — the swings are the size random monthly noise produces.

How we measured it · 32,977 player-games · 249 hitters▾

Batters with 300+ AB and 40+ games in the 2026 season (qualified hitters). Each game's hit/no-hit result is compared to that player's own season hit-rate; bucketed by calendar month.

MLBA small dip

Getaway-day games: worse hitting?

When a home team plays a day game right after a night game, do its hitters perform worse?

.238
batting average, day game after a night game
Day-after-nightOther home games
Batting avg.238.253
At-bats6,99422,448

Home hitters batted .238 in games that immediately followed a night game at the same park, versus .253 in every other home game with a recorded first pitch (z = -2.4). A modest dip — consistent with a short-rest effect, though the gap is small next to normal day-to-day variance.

How we measured it · 29,442 at-bats · 1,083 games with known first pitch▾

First-pitch times (mlb_game_weather) converted to each ballpark's local time using its standard-season UTC offset; a game is 'day' if local first pitch is before 5pm. Home-team hitters only, compared across every home game we have a first-pitch time for. Approximate — ignores park roofs and rare early-April/late-Sept clock-change edge cases.

Market backtests

Already live · deepest example today

What We've Measured — College Football

Four angles we tested and killed on our own archive of FBS results and closing lines — SP+ ratings vs the spread (49.8% ATS on 1,589 games), wind, rain and altitude on totals. Published with the same numbers whether they worked or not.

Read the full page →

Other written studies

College Football — SP+, wind, rain, altitude

The angles above, in full: methodology, sample sizes, and the ones that didn't beat the closing line.

NFL — Numbers

Team and player trends pulled from the same gamelog archive our NFL picks are graded against.

WNBA — Numbers

Team and player trends from the WNBA box-score archive, same treatment.

Our track record

MLB — Results

Every MLB pick we've published, graded win or loss, in full.

NFL — Results

Every NFL pick we've published, graded win or loss, in full.

WNBA — Results

Every WNBA pick we've published, graded win or loss, in full.

MLB — NRFI record

Every no-run-first-inning pick, graded, against the league base rate.

MLB — Closing line value

Whether the line moved our way after we made the pick — the standard sportsbooks themselves use to judge a bettor.

Descriptive market statistics, computed daily

64%

of MLB props priced +200 or longer

Of 1,238,508 graded props this season, 789,157 closed at +200 or longer. Staked flat at one unit each, that group returned -29.9%. This describes what the shelf has done, not a strategy.

mlb · computed from props_resolved

CFB is our deepest write-up because that market has been backtested most extensively — but it's not the only one. NFL and WNBA have their own published number studies above, and our full pick history is public too. Same standard everywhere: publish it whether it worked or not.