CFB
Where they rank
Team-advanced percentile vs. the FBS field · descriptive only, not a prediction of Saturday.
UTEP
Offensive efficiency (PPA)1th pct.
Offensive success rate1th pct.
Explosiveness89th pct.
Defensive efficiency (PPA)5th pct.
Defensive success rate allowed3th pct.
Havoc rate6th pct.
Michigan
Offensive efficiency (PPA)31th pct.
Offensive success rate42th pct.
Explosiveness30th pct.
Defensive efficiency (PPA)96th pct.
Defensive success rate allowed90th pct.
Havoc rate59th pct.
UTEP · Returning production
Overall (PPA)-1.1%
Passing18.1%
Rushing-30.9%
Receiving15.3%
Against the spread, last 3 seasons
ATS 7-15 · O/U 13-9 · avg. margin -11.9
Michigan · Returning production
Overall (PPA)69.2%
Passing103.7%
Rushing58.9%
Receiving60.1%
Against the spread, last 3 seasons
ATS 10-16 · O/U 14-12 · avg. margin +4.6
Head-to-head
Last 1 meetings2026UTEP 17–52 Michigan
Venue & conditions
Michigan Stadium · Ann Arbor, MI
64°F · 9.1 mph wind · 77% precip. chance