College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Florida State vs Miami FL

Sat 7:00 PM ETtotal 56.536 props

Darian MensahMIAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 279 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct6% of passing production back price steady
150+-290096.7%160+-210095.5%170+-144093.5%180+-104091.2%190+-78088.6%200+-58685.4%210+-45682%220+-35578%230+-28073.7%240+-22068.8%250+-17864%260+-14158.5%263+-11753.9%264+-11854.1%268+-11353.1%269+-11653.7%270+-11252.8%271+-11453.3%272+-12054.5%273+-11954.3%274+-11152.6%275+-11854.1%276+-11753.9%277+-11353.1%280++11147.4%290++13642.4%300++16937.2%310++21032.3%320++26127.7%330++32323.6%340++40719.7%350++50916.4%360++63013.7%370++80011.1%380++10208.9%390++12407.5%
Malachi ToneyMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 111 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production backbet up +112 → -103
40+-310096.9%50+-190095%60+-89089.9%70+-50083.3%80+-30775.4%90+-20467.1%97+-12154.8%99+-12054.5%100+-14459%101+-11854.1%103+-12154.8%104+-12255%105+-11653.7%106+-11753.9%107+-12054.5%108+-11753.9%109+-11653.7%110+-10350.7%120++13342.9%130++17736.1%140++23629.8%150++31024.4%160++39520.2%170++51216.3%180++66013.2%190++86010.4%200++10808.5%
Ashton DanielsFSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 190 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct13% of passing production backdrifted -113 → +101
150+-23970.5%160+-18965.4%170+-15260.3%180+-12355.2%182+-11854.1%183+-11753.9%184+-11553.5%185+-12154.8%186+-11954.3%187+-11453.3%188+-11453.3%189+-11653.7%190++10149.8%191+-11854.1%200++12544.4%210++15439.4%220++19234.2%230++23729.7%240++29725.2%250++36721.4%260++46617.7%270++59414.4%280++76011.6%290++9409.6%300++11807.8%310++12807.2%
Mark FletcherMIARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 92 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct91% of rushing production back price steady
30+-320097%40+-116092.1%50+-59485.6%60+-34677.6%70+-21868.6%80+-14759.5%84+-11954.3%85+-11854.1%86+-11753.9%87+-11553.5%88+-11854.1%90+-10551.2%100++13143.3%110++17536.4%120++23330%130++30524.7%140++40419.8%150++52616%160++67013%170++86010.4%180++11208.2%190++12407.5%
Ousmane KromahFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct28% of rushing production backdrifted -131 → +108
20+-170094.4%25+-89089.9%30+-53584.3%40+-26172.3%50+-14759.5%55+-11653.7%56+-11653.7%57+-11753.9%58+-11453.3%59+-11553.5%60++10848.1%61+-12355.2%62+-12154.8%70++16737.5%80++25028.6%90++36321.6%100++52016.1%110++73012%120++10009.1%130++12207.6%140++12207.6%
Cooper BarkateMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 63 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production backdrifted -113 → -104
15+-240096%25+-104091.2%40+-29774.8%50+-16962.8%51+-12154.8%52+-11052.4%53+-12355.2%56+-12154.8%57+-11653.7%58+-11453.3%59+-12255%60+-10451%61+-11553.5%70++14540.8%80++21232.1%90++30324.8%100++43318.8%110++59614.4%120++83010.8%130++10808.5%
Micahi DanzyFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production backdrifted -128 → -108
15+-97090.7%25+-34677.6%40+-12555.6%42+-11252.8%43+-11353.1%44+-13056.5%45+-10851.9%46+-12555.6%47+-12255%48+-11954.3%49+-12255%50++13442.7%60++21331.9%70++32223.7%80++47417.4%90++69012.7%100++10009.1%110++12007.7%120++12807.2%
Javian MalloryMIARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 47 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct91% of rushing production back price steady
10+-250096.2%15+-158094%20+-75088.2%25+-43281.2%30+-28474%37+-11954.3%38+-11653.7%39+-12255%40+-14459%44+-11553.5%50++12045.5%60++19434%70++30124.9%80++44918.2%90++66013.2%100++9609.4%
Ashton DanielsFSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct28% of rushing production back price steady
10+-152093.8%15+-61085.9%20+-33677.1%25+-21568.3%29+-11052.4%30+-14459%32+-11954.3%33+-11753.9%34+-11753.9%40++13043.5%50++22331%60++36021.7%70++57514.8%80++87010.3%90++12407.5%
Daylyn UpshawMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production back price steady
15+-57485.2%25+-22669.3%27+-11753.9%28+-11653.7%29+-11854.1%33+-11753.9%34+-12255%35+-11453.3%36+-11553.5%40++11446.7%50++18934.6%60++30025%70++46617.7%80++70012.5%90++10208.9%
Duce RobinsonFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production backdrifted -117 → -109
15+-138093.2%25+-44681.7%40+-15761.1%43+-11252.8%44+-11252.8%45+-11753.9%46+-12655.8%47+-10952.2%50++10947.8%60++17037%70++25827.9%80++38920.4%90++56515%100++78011.4%110++11008.3%
Jayvan BoggsFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 35 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
15+-39579.8%25+-16362%29+-11954.3%30+-11553.5%31+-11653.7%32+-11353.1%33+-11553.5%40++15738.9%50++25827.9%60++40219.9%70++62013.9%80++9309.7%90++12607.4%
Elija LoftonMIAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct45% of receiving production backdrifted -114 → -107
15+-24771.2%23+-12255%24+-11553.5%25+-10751.7%26+-11854.1%27+-11854.1%40++23429.9%50++38320.7%60++62013.9%70++9609.4%80++12807.2%
Ousmane KromahFSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 17 ydsFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct65% of receiving production back price steady
15+-12054.5%16+-11052.4%25++18135.6%40++45618%50++79011.2%60++12807.2%
Ashton DanielsFSUAnytime TD
47.6% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+11047.6%
Chris Wheatley-HumphreyMIAAnytime TD
13.3% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backdrifted +390 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Cooper BarkateMIAAnytime TD
56.5% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backbet up -105 → -130
Over-13056.5%
Darian MensahMIAAnytime TD
29.4% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backbet up +270 → +240
Over+24029.4%
Daylyn UpshawMIAAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+16537.7%
Desirrio RilesFSUAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+80011.1%
Duce RobinsonFSUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+21531.7%
Elija LoftonMIAAnytime TD
34.5% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backdrifted +155 → +190
Over+19034.5%
Florida State D/STAnytime TD
10% to scoredrifted +700 → +900
Over+90010%
Girard PringleMIAAnytime TD
29% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backdrifted +175 → +245
Over+24529%
Javian MalloryMIAAnytime TD
53.5% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backbet up +100 → -115
Over-11553.5%
Jayvan BoggsFSUAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production backbet up +350 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Landen ThomasFSUAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Malachi ToneyMIAAnytime TD
69.7% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over-23069.7%
Mark FletcherMIAAnytime TD
71.4% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production backdrifted -300 → -250
Over-25071.4%
Miami FL D/STAnytime TD
20.4% to score price steady
Over+39020.4%
Micahi DanzyFSUAnytime TD
27.4% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+26527.4%
Ousmane KromahFSUAnytime TD
52.4% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production backbet up +100 → -110
Over-11052.4%
Quintrevion WisnerFSUAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreFSU implied 18 pts · underdogMiami D was tough — 90th pct40% of overall production backbet up +350 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Somourian WingoMIAAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Vance SpaffordMIAAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Vandrevius JacobsMIAAnytime TD
19% to scoreMIA implied 38.5 pts · favouredFlorida State D was middling — 45th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+42519%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.