College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Georgia Tech vs Virginia Tech

Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 56.540 props

Ethan GrunkemeyerVTPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 305 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct0% of passing production backdrifted -113 → -103
180+-260096.3%190+-178094.7%200+-128092.8%210+-95090.5%220+-70087.5%230+-52884.1%240+-40780.3%250+-32076.2%260+-25471.8%270+-20166.8%280+-16061.5%290+-12956.3%292+-11753.9%293+-11653.7%294+-11854.1%295+-11653.7%296+-11653.7%297+-11653.7%298+-11653.7%299+-11453.3%300+-10350.7%301+-11653.7%310++12245%320++15040%330++18834.7%340++23230.1%350++29025.6%360++35721.9%370++44718.3%380++56515%390++70012.5%400++90010%410++11208.2%420++12007.7%
Jeffrey OvertonVTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 80 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct31% of rushing production back price steady
25+-310096.9%30+-176094.6%40+-72087.8%50+-36978.7%60+-22268.9%70+-14258.7%73+-12154.8%74+-12054.5%75+-11854.1%76+-11453.3%77+-11854.1%78+-11453.3%79+-11854.1%80++10149.8%90++14341.2%100++19733.7%110++26727.2%120++36421.6%130++48117.2%140++63013.7%150++83010.8%160++10608.6%170++12607.4%
Alberto MendozaGTPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 242 ydsGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct0% of passing production back price steady
150+-90090%160+-69087.3%170+-53084.1%180+-41680.6%190+-32376.4%200+-25671.9%210+-20367%220+-16261.8%230+-13256.9%234+-12054.5%240+-10551.2%250++11845.9%260++14840.3%270++18135.6%280++22530.8%290++28126.2%300++35422%310++44018.5%320++54715.5%330++69012.7%340++86010.4%350++11208.2%
Marcellous HawkinsVTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 55 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct31% of rushing production backdrifted -116 → -105
15+-230095.8%20+-102091.1%25+-57785.2%30+-36978.7%40+-18564.9%43+-11954.3%44+-11653.7%45+-10551.2%46+-13056.5%47+-11353.1%50+-10651.5%52+-12956.3%53+-11453.3%54+-11553.5%60++15339.5%70++23629.8%80++36021.7%90++53515.7%100++78011.4%110++11208.2%120++10608.6%
Justice HaynesGTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 78 ydsGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct35% of rushing production back price steady
25+-290096.7%30+-152093.8%40+-63086.3%50+-34377.4%60+-20467.1%70+-13256.9%72+-12355.2%73+-11954.3%80++10947.8%90++15838.8%100++22131.2%110++30224.9%120++40819.7%130++54815.4%140++72012.2%150++9309.7%160++12007.7%
Luke ReynoldsVTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 68 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct54% of receiving production backbet up +118 → +109
25+-160094.1%40+-41380.5%50+-23169.8%60+-14058.3%62+-11653.7%63+-11553.5%64+-11453.3%65+-11252.8%66+-11353.1%70++10947.8%80++16138.3%90++23130.2%100++32223.7%110++44918.2%120++60014.3%130++83010.8%140++11408.1%
Que'Sean BrownVTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 67 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct54% of receiving production back price steady
25+-164094.3%40+-40880.3%50+-22268.9%60+-13357.1%61+-12054.5%62+-11353.1%63+-11453.3%64+-11252.8%65+-11152.6%70++11446.7%80++16737.5%90++23929.5%100++33323.1%110++46417.7%120++63013.7%130++84010.6%140++11408.1%
Ayden GreeneVTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 48 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct54% of receiving production backdrifted -122 → -108
15+-90090%25+-32376.4%40+-11954.3%41+-11353.1%44+-11854.1%45+-10851.9%46+-11152.6%47+-11052.4%50++14041.7%60++22031.3%70++32923.3%80++49116.9%90++72012.2%100++10208.9%110++11408.1%
Jordan AllenGTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 58 ydsGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-310096.9%25+-88089.8%40+-26772.8%50+-15060%54+-11954.3%55+-11753.9%60++10748.3%70++16338%80++23829.6%90++34022.7%100++47617.4%110++66013.2%120++89010.1%130++12207.6%
Dalen PensonGTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct11% of receiving production back price steady
15+-82089.1%25+-29874.9%39+-12054.5%40+-11152.6%41+-11152.6%50++15040%60++23729.7%70++36721.4%80++54815.4%90++80011.1%100++11607.9%
Davion BrownVTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct54% of receiving production back price steady
15+-18865.3%19+-12355.2%20+-11252.8%21+-11553.5%22+-11753.9%23+-11753.9%25++11646.3%40++28825.8%50++50516.5%60++85010.5%70++10608.6%
Jeffrey OvertonVTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 26 ydsVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct54% of receiving production backdrifted -3000 → -106
15+-24070.6%24+-11453.3%25+-10651.5%40++23429.9%50++39520.2%60++62013.9%70++9709.3%
Aidan Birrfgm
market midpoint ≈ 2 price steady
1+-31075.6%2++17037%
Alberto MendozaGTAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +600 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Ayden GreeneVTAnytime TD
30.3% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +300 → +230
Over+23030.3%
Benji GosnellVTAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +700 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Chad AlexanderGTAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +550 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Chris CorboGTAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Dalen PensonGTAnytime TD
23.8% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+32023.8%
Davion BrownVTAnytime TD
21.7% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +400 → +360
Over+36021.7%
Ethan GrunkemeyerVTAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +200 → +165
Over+16537.7%
Gavin HarrisGTAnytime TD
13.3% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +750 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Georgia Tech D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%
Isaiah FuhrmannGTAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Ja'Ricous HairstonVTAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +700 → +600
Over+60014.3%
Jaiven PlummerGTAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Jeffrey OvertonVTAnytime TD
73.3% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backdrifted -425 → -275
Over-27573.3%
John Lovefgm
bet up +150 → +140
2++14041.7%
Jordan AllenGTAnytime TD
29.4% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+24029.4%
Justice HaynesGTAnytime TD
76.7% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over-33076.7%
Kevin RocheGTAnytime TD
27.4% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production back price steady
Over+26527.4%
Luke ReynoldsVTAnytime TD
50% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +115 → +100
Over+10050%
Malachi HosleyGTAnytime TD
44.4% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +500 → +125
Over+12544.4%
Marcellous HawkinsVTAnytime TD
62.3% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backdrifted -260 → -165
Over-16562.3%
Marlion JacksonVTAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +500 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Que'Sean BrownVTAnytime TD
42.6% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production backbet up +155 → +135
Over+13542.6%
Rahkeem SmithGTAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +1100 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Trelain MaddoxGTAnytime TD
76.2% to scoreGT implied 24 pts · underdogVirginia Tech D was soft — 10th pct13% of overall production backbet up +105 → -320
Over-32076.2%
Tyseer DenmarkVTAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreVT implied 32.5 pts · favouredGeorgia Tech D was soft — 27th pct37% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Virginia Tech D/STAnytime TD
17.4% to score price steady
Over+47517.4%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.