College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Wisconsin vs UCLA

Sat 7:30 PM ETtotal 42.538 props

Colton JosephWISPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 194 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct-500% of passing production back price steady
150+-26472.5%160+-20967.6%170+-16962.8%180+-13557.4%185+-11854.1%186+-11854.1%187+-11854.1%188+-11753.9%189+-11753.9%190+-10851.9%200++11446.7%210++14241.3%220++17836%230++22131.2%240++27926.4%250++35422%260++45318.1%270++57514.8%280++72012.2%290++9209.8%300++11408.1%310++12807.2%
Wayne KnightUCLARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 90 ydsUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct86% of rushing production back price steady
30+-290096.7%40+-108091.5%50+-54884.6%60+-32176.2%70+-20567.2%80+-14058.3%83+-11353.1%84+-11954.3%85+-11753.9%86+-11653.7%90++10050%100++13941.8%110++18535.1%120++24429.1%130++31923.9%140++41419.5%150++53815.7%160++68012.8%170++87010.3%180++11208.2%
Abu SamaWISRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 53 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct32% of rushing production back price steady
15+-250096.2%20+-110091.7%25+-61085.9%30+-38779.5%40+-18965.4%49+-11453.3%50+-10952.2%51+-11453.3%60++14840.3%70++22830.5%80++34222.6%90++49216.9%100++70012.5%110++10208.9%120++12207.6%
Ty DieffenbachUCLAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 157 ydsUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct55% of passing production back price steady
149+-11854.1%150+-11653.7%151+-11653.7%160++10748.3%170++13243.1%180++16637.6%190++20832.5%200++26227.6%210++32223.7%220++40020%230++50516.5%240++64013.5%250++81011%260++10208.9%270++12807.2%
Colton JosephWISRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 46 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct32% of rushing production backdrifted -133 → -116
15+-126092.6%20+-63086.3%25+-37378.9%30+-24671.1%40+-12856.1%41+-12054.5%42+-11653.7%43+-13256.9%50++13842%60++22031.3%70++34322.6%80++51916.2%90++77011.5%100++11208.2%
Semaj MorganUCLAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-67087%25+-25471.8%37+-11653.7%38+-11353.1%39+-11453.3%40++10349.3%50++17136.9%60++27027%70++41019.6%80++61014.1%90++89010.1%100++11607.9%
Tyrell HenryWISReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 40 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-63086.3%25+-24871.3%37+-11453.3%38+-11353.1%40++10449%50++17536.4%60++26827.2%70++41419.5%80++61014.1%90++88010.2%100++12207.6%
Chris BrooksWISReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-33577%25+-14358.8%28+-11753.9%29+-11653.7%30+-11954.3%40++17436.5%50++28925.7%60++45618%70++71012.3%80++10808.5%
Brian RoweUCLAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 25 ydsUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-22469.1%22+-11252.8%23+-11854.1%24+-11653.7%25+-10250.5%40++23829.6%50++40919.6%60++66013.2%70++10408.8%
Eugene HiltonWISReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-26272.4%25+-11653.7%26+-11653.7%27+-11553.5%40++21431.8%50++35621.9%60++57114.9%70++9209.8%80++12607.4%
Jacob HarrisWISReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 29 ydsWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct34% of receiving production back price steady
15+-26272.4%25+-11353.1%26+-11954.3%40++21431.8%50++36321.6%60++57414.8%70++90010%80++12607.4%
Landon EllisUCLAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct34% of receiving production backdrifted -120 → -110
15+-14258.7%16+-12555.6%17+-11052.4%18+-11052.4%25++15339.5%40++37621%50++64013.5%60++10808.5%
Abu SamaWISAnytime TD
44.4% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backbet up +280 → +125
Over+12544.4%
Aidan MizellUCLAAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Anthony WoodsUCLAAnytime TD
43.5% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production backdrifted -110 → +130
Over+13043.5%
Brayden LoftinUCLAAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Brian RoweUCLAAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+45018.2%
Bryan JacksonWISAnytime TD
13.3% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backdrifted +400 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Chris BrooksWISAnytime TD
25.6% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backbet up +340 → +290
Over+29025.6%
Colton JosephWISAnytime TD
48.8% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backdrifted -125 → +105
Over+10548.8%
Darrion DupreeWISAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backdrifted +130 → +215
Over+21531.7%
Emmett BorkWISAnytime TD
9.5% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production backdrifted +800 → +950
Over+9509.5%
Eugene HiltonWISAnytime TD
21.7% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+36021.7%
Gavin Lahmfgm
price steady
1+-28574%
Grant StecWISAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Jacob HarrisWISAnytime TD
24.4% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+31024.4%
Jaivian ThomasUCLAAnytime TD
35.7% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production backdrifted +145 → +180
Over+18035.7%
Landon EllisUCLAAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Leland SmithUCLAAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+11008.3%
Malachi ColemanWISAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+80011.1%
Mateen Bhaghanifgm
price steady
2++13542.6%
Semaj MorganUCLAAnytime TD
23.3% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+33023.3%
Shamar RigbyWISAnytime TD
6.7% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+14006.7%
Ty DieffenbachUCLAAnytime TD
26% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production backbet up +500 → +285
Over+28526%
Tyrell HenryWISAnytime TD
33.3% to scoreWIS implied 20 pts · underdogUCLA D was soft — 1th pct31% of overall production back price steady
Over+20033.3%
UCLA D/STAnytime TD
19% to score price steady
Over+42519%
Wayne KnightUCLAAnytime TD
66.7% to scoreUCLA implied 22.5 pts · favouredWisconsin D was soft — 19th pct57% of overall production backdrifted -235 → -200
Over-20066.7%
Wisconsin D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.