College Player Props
Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.
No hit rates here, on purpose
We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.
These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.
Arizona State vs Texas Tech
Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 50.536 props- Cutter BoleyASUPassing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 220 ydsASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct5% of passing production backbet up +144 → +101150+-47682.6%160+-36978.7%170+-28874.2%180+-22869.5%190+-18164.4%195+-11854.1%196+-11854.1%197+-11753.9%198+-11453.3%200+-14659.3%201+-11453.3%210+-12255%211+-11954.3%212+-11553.5%213+-11954.3%214+-11553.5%216+-11753.9%217+-11753.9%220++10149.8%230++12444.6%240++15239.7%250++20033.3%260++24628.9%270++31124.3%280++39420.2%290++49716.8%300++63013.7%310++79011.2%320++10009.1%330++12607.4%
- J'Koby WilliamsTTURushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 97 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady25+-310096.9%30+-310096.9%40+-130092.9%50+-65086.7%60+-36878.6%70+-23770.3%73+-12154.8%78+-11854.1%80+-16061.5%81+-11954.3%87+-11653.7%88+-12054.5%89+-11854.1%90+-11453.3%91+-11453.3%93+-11353.1%96+-11152.6%100++12045.5%110++16138.3%120++21331.9%130++28326.1%140++37121.2%150++47817.3%160++61014.1%170++77011.5%180++9909.2%190++12407.5%200++12007.7%
- Will HammondTTUPassing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 236 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct27% of passing production back price steady150+-79088.8%160+-58985.5%170+-44881.8%180+-34877.7%190+-27673.4%200+-21968.7%210+-17463.5%220+-13958.2%225+-11553.5%226+-11753.9%227+-11753.9%228+-11653.7%229+-11453.3%230+-11152.6%231+-11553.5%240++11147.4%250++13842%260++17436.5%270++21631.6%280++26727.2%290++33622.9%300++41819.3%310++52116.1%320++65013.3%330++84010.6%340++10608.6%350++12407.5%
- Reed HarrisASUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 87 ydsASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct31% of receiving production backdrifted -122 → -101
- Omarion MillerASUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 56 ydsASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct31% of receiving production backdrifted -186 → -104
- Kenny JohnsonTTUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 59 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
- Quinten JoynerTTURushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 64 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady
- Cameron DickeyTTURushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 66 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production back price steady
- Coy EakinTTUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 44 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
- Kyson BrownASURushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 34 ydsASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct-5% of rushing production backdrifted -128 → -105
- J'Koby WilliamsTTUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 30 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
- Micah HudsonTTUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 25 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production backbet up +134 → +106
- Terrance CarterTTUReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 40 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct57% of receiving production back price steady
- Will HammondTTURushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 17 ydsTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct99% of rushing production backdrifted -121 → -112
- Carson SmithASUfgmmarket midpoint ≈ 2 ASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct price steady
- AJ IaASUAnytime TD14.3% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production backbet up +900 → +600
- Arizona State D/STAnytime TD16.7% to score price steady
- Cardae MackASUAnytime TD25% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Coy EakinTTUAnytime TD33.3% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Cutter BoleyASUAnytime TD26.3% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- J'Koby WilliamsTTUAnytime TD85.2% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production backbet up -500 → -575
- Jalen JonesTTUAnytime TD15.4% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Jalen MossASUAnytime TD8.3% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Kenny JohnsonTTUAnytime TD42.6% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Kyson BrownASUAnytime TD32.8% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Malcolm SimmonsTTUAnytime TD15.4% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Marquis GillisASUAnytime TD18.2% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Micah HudsonTTUAnytime TD20.4% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Omarion MillerASUAnytime TD39.2% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Quinten JoynerTTUAnytime TD52.4% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Raiden Vines-BrightASUAnytime TD16.7% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Reed HarrisASUAnytime TD44.4% to scoreASU implied 17.5 pts · underdogTexas Tech D was tough — 100th pct16% of overall production back price steady
- Stone Harringtonfgmdrifted +120 → +140
- Terrance CarterTTUAnytime TD35.1% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production back price steady
- Texas Tech D/STAnytime TD21.7% to score price steady
- Will HammondTTUAnytime TD34.5% to scoreTTU implied 33 pts · favouredArizona State D was middling — 58th pct53% of overall production backbet up +205 → +190
Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.