College Player Props
Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.
No hit rates here, on purpose
We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.
These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.
Louisiana Tech vs ULM
Sat 8:00 PM ETtotal 55.524 props- Aidan ArmentaULMAnytime TD23.8% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Andrew BurnetteLTAnytime TD82.6% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Austin CarlisleULMAnytime TD45.5% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Blake BakerLTAnytime TD48.8% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Bryce AndersonULMAnytime TD18.2% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Bryson RolandULMAnytime TD35.7% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Derrick JamesonULMAnytime TD37.7% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Eli FinleyLTAnytime TD40.8% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Jaden MillerLTAnytime TD60% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Jalen MickensLTAnytime TD50% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Jason HoathULMAnytime TD6.7% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Jay WilkersonLTAnytime TD11.1% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- JP CoulterULMAnytime TD16.7% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Louisiana Tech D/STAnytime TD18.2% to score price steady
- LT RobinsonULMAnytime TD21.3% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Luke WatkinsLTAnytime TD11.1% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Marcellus JacksonULMAnytime TD28.2% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Marcus Calwise Jr.LTAnytime TD15.4% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Nic TrujilloULMAnytime TD25.6% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Parker FulghumULMAnytime TD22.2% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- Sergio SniderLTAnytime TD48.8% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Talyn ShettronLTAnytime TD22.7% to scoreLT implied 35.5 pts · favouredUL Monroe D was middling — 57th pct64% of overall production back price steady
- Trevon KinchenULMAnytime TD10% to scoreULM implied 20 pts · underdogLouisiana Tech D was tough — 85th pct39% of overall production back price steady
- ULM D/STAnytime TD13.3% to score price steady
Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.