College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Virginia vs SMU

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 51.538 props

Kevin JenningsSMUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 291 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct97% of passing production backbet up +108 → -102
160+-310096.9%170+-240096%180+-170094.4%190+-124092.5%200+-90090%210+-66086.8%220+-50883.6%230+-40380.1%240+-31475.8%250+-24671.1%260+-19666.2%270+-15861.2%274+-11954.3%279+-11653.7%280+-12856.1%281+-11453.3%282+-11353.1%283+-11854.1%284+-11753.9%290+-10250.5%300++12045.5%310++14840.3%320++18435.2%330++23030.3%340++28625.9%350++36021.7%360++44918.2%370++56015.2%380++70012.5%390++90010%400++11408.1%
Beau PribulaUVAPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 198 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct1% of passing production backbet up +138 → +106
150+-29274.5%160+-23169.8%170+-18364.7%177+-11753.9%178+-11553.5%180+-14559.2%181+-11553.5%183+-11653.7%184+-11653.7%188+-11653.7%189+-11954.3%190+-11753.9%191+-11553.5%192+-11653.7%200++10648.5%210++13143.3%220++16138.3%230++19933.4%240++24828.7%250++30924.4%260++38520.6%270++48017.2%280++60014.3%290++77011.5%300++9809.3%310++12407.5%
Kendrick RaphaelSMURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 97 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct1% of rushing production back price steady
30+-240096%40+-140093.3%50+-69087.3%60+-40080%70+-25171.5%80+-17063%81+-11854.1%90+-11954.3%91+-11553.5%92+-11553.5%93+-11553.5%100++11546.5%110++15439.4%120++20233.1%130++26127.7%140++33423%150++43218.8%160++54415.5%170++70012.5%180++90010%190++11208.2%200++12807.2%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 77 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct21% of rushing production back price steady
25+-240096%30+-128092.8%40+-55384.7%50+-30175.1%60+-18164.4%68+-12255%69+-12455.4%70+-12054.5%71+-12255%72+-11954.3%73+-12154.8%74+-11854.1%80++12344.8%90++17336.6%100++24129.3%110++33423%120++45817.9%130++61014.1%140++82010.9%150++10808.5%160++12607.4%
DaShawn MartinUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 43 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct9% of receiving production back price steady
15+-90090%25+-32676.5%35+-11753.9%36+-11353.1%37+-11653.7%38+-11353.1%39+-11553.5%40+-11954.3%41+-11353.1%50++14141.5%60++22231.1%70++33922.8%80++50416.6%90++72012.2%100++10208.9%
Jalen CooperSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 49 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production backbet up +127 → +107
15+-140093.3%25+-44981.8%40+-15761.1%42+-12856.1%43+-11353.1%44+-12555.6%45+-12755.9%50++10748.3%60++17037%70++26127.7%80++37820.9%90++55815.2%100++79011.2%110++11208.2%
Yamir KnightSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 60 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
25+-93090.3%40+-28173.8%50+-15761.1%54+-11854.1%55+-11954.3%56+-11954.3%60++10149.8%70++15439.4%80++22430.9%90++32323.6%100++45318.1%110++62013.9%120++83010.8%130++11208.2%
Yannick SmithSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 54 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production backbet up -111 → -121
15+-230095.8%25+-65086.7%40+-20967.6%48+-12255%49+-12555.6%50+-12154.8%60++13143.3%70++19733.7%80++28526%90++41119.6%100++57714.8%110++82010.9%120++11208.2%
Kameron CourtneyUVAReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct9% of receiving production backdrifted -120 → -111
15+-52684%25+-21368.1%31+-11453.3%32+-11152.6%33+-11553.5%34+-11553.5%40++12245%50++20333%60++32523.5%70++48717%80++73012%90++10808.5%
Randy PittmanSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 32 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-30975.6%25+-13657.6%26+-11653.7%27+-11854.1%28+-11753.9%29+-12054.5%40++18734.8%50++31024.4%60++49616.8%70++76011.6%80++11008.3%
Beau PribulaUVARushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 19 ydsUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct21% of rushing production backbet up +130 → +106
10+-27373.2%15+-14959.8%16+-12255%17+-12355.2%20++10648.5%25++16038.5%30++22331%40++40819.7%50++70012.5%60++11408.1%
Kendrick RaphaelSMUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 20 ydsSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct37% of receiving production back price steady
15+-15160.2%18+-11753.9%25++14241.3%40++35921.8%50++61014.1%60++10009.1%
Beau PribulaUVAAnytime TD
40% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backbet up +245 → +150
Over+15040%
Dakota TwittyUVAAnytime TD
13.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +550 → +650
Over+65013.3%
DaShawn MartinUVAAnytime TD
36.4% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+17536.4%
Derrick McFallSMUAnytime TD
40% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up +245 → +150
Over+15040%
Dramekco GreenSMUAnytime TD
36.4% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+17536.4%
Isaiah RobinsonUVAAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Jacquon GibsonUVAAnytime TD
21.7% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+36021.7%
Jalen CooperSMUAnytime TD
37% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+17037%
Jalen HaleSMUAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backdrifted +360 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Jekail MiddlebrookUVAAnytime TD
51.2% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backbet up +115 → -105
Over-10551.2%
John RogersUVAAnytime TD
9.1% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +800 → +1000
Over+10009.1%
Kameron CourtneyUVAAnytime TD
32.8% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backbet up +235 → +205
Over+20532.8%
Kendrick RaphaelSMUAnytime TD
76.2% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production backbet up -205 → -320
Over-32076.2%
Kevin JenningsSMUAnytime TD
37.7% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+16537.7%
Noah VaughnUVAAnytime TD
18.2% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+45018.2%
Randy PittmanSMUAnytime TD
36.4% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+17536.4%
Rico Flores Jr.UVAAnytime TD
25.3% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+29525.3%
SMU D/STAnytime TD
15.4% to scoredrifted +400 → +550
Over+55015.4%
Theo Melin OhrstromSMUAnytime TD
31.7% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+21531.7%
TyLyric ColemanUVAAnytime TD
17.4% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+47517.4%
Virginia D/STAnytime TD
16.7% to score price steady
Over+50016.7%
Will Bettridgefgm
price steady
1+-31075.6%
Xavier BrownUVAAnytime TD
30.8% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production back price steady
Over+22530.8%
Xay DavisUVAAnytime TD
28.2% to scoreUVA implied 21 pts · underdogSMU D was middling — 63th pct10% of overall production backdrifted +230 → +255
Over+25528.2%
Yamir KnightSMUAnytime TD
47.6% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+11047.6%
Yannick SmithSMUAnytime TD
33.3% to scoreSMU implied 30.5 pts · favouredVirginia D was tough — 86th pct57% of overall production back price steady
Over+20033.3%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.