College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Penn State vs Michigan

Sat 3:30 PM ETtotal 42.539 props

Rocco BechtPSUPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 208 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct3% of passing production backdrifted -102 → +107
150+-36178.3%160+-28674.1%170+-22769.4%180+-18064.3%190+-14459%198+-11653.7%199+-11753.9%200+-11453.3%202+-11453.3%204+-11753.9%210++10748.3%220++13243.1%230++16338%240++20333%250++25228.4%260++31724%270++39420.2%280++49716.8%290++62013.9%300++78011.4%310++10009.1%320++12807.2%
Bryce UnderwoodMICHPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 187 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct104% of passing production back price steady
150+-22168.8%160+-17864%170+-14158.5%178+-11753.9%179+-11753.9%180+-11553.5%181+-11553.5%190++10748.3%200++13442.7%210++16637.6%220++20333%230++25128.5%240++30924.4%250++39020.4%260++48317.2%270++60014.3%280++78011.4%290++9909.2%300++12407.5%
JJ BuchananMICHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 70 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct60% of receiving production backdrifted -107 → +103
25+-180094.7%40+-44381.6%50+-24370.8%60+-14959.8%65+-11753.9%66+-11553.5%67+-11353.1%68+-12054.5%69+-12856.1%70++10349.3%80++15239.7%90++21531.7%100++30025%110++41219.5%120++55715.2%130++75011.8%140++10208.9%150++12607.4%
Jordan MarshallMICHRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 56 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct59% of rushing production back price steady
15+-280096.6%20+-126092.6%25+-67087%30+-42681%40+-20867.5%50+-12054.5%51+-11453.3%52+-11653.7%53+-11353.1%54+-11653.7%55+-11252.8%60++13442.7%70++20532.8%80++30924.4%90++45518%100++65013.3%110++9409.6%120++12807.2%
Savion HiterMICHRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 46 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct59% of rushing production backbet up -103 → -116
10+-310096.9%15+-124092.5%20+-62086.1%25+-36878.6%30+-24170.7%39+-11854.1%40+-12555.6%41+-11854.1%42+-11854.1%43+-11753.9%44+-11653.7%50++13642.4%60++22430.9%70++34922.3%80++53415.8%90++80011.1%100++11607.9%
Chase SowellPSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 57 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-300096.8%25+-73088%40+-23269.9%50+-13557.4%52+-12255%53+-12154.8%54+-12355.2%60++11845.9%70++17935.8%80++26527.4%90++38420.7%100++55015.4%110++78011.4%120++10608.6%130++12207.6%
Andrew MarshMICHReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 61 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct60% of receiving production backdrifted -117 → -103
25+-102091.1%40+-29274.5%50+-16762.5%56+-12255%57+-11854.1%58+-11854.1%60+-10350.7%70++14840.3%80++21431.8%90++30524.7%100++42319.1%110++59114.5%120++82010.9%130++11208.2%
Bryce UnderwoodMICHRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 37 ydsMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct59% of rushing production back price steady
10+-154093.9%15+-64086.5%20+-35377.9%25+-22469.1%30+-15260.3%33+-12255%34+-12255%35+-11854.1%40++12744.1%50++22331%60++36421.6%70++55515.3%80++84010.6%90++12807.2%
Carson HansenPSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 38 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct-2% of rushing production back price steady
10+-172094.5%15+-70087.5%20+-37378.9%25+-22969.6%30+-15560.8%34+-11854.1%35+-12054.5%36+-11954.3%40++12245%50++21032.3%60++34422.5%70++55015.4%80++83010.8%90++12407.5%
Brett EskildsenPSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 44 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-86089.6%25+-30775.4%38+-11353.1%39+-12154.8%40+-11553.5%41+-11453.3%42+-11353.1%50++14540.8%60++23130.2%70++35322.1%80++51016.4%90++75011.8%100++10808.5%
James PeoplesPSURushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 24 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct-2% of rushing production back price steady
10+-42681%15+-22168.8%20+-13457.3%21+-12355.2%22+-12355.2%23+-11653.7%25++11346.9%30++16038.5%40++29625.3%50++50816.4%60++80011.1%70++12807.2%
Andrew RappleyeaPSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 31 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31375.8%25+-13657.6%27+-11854.1%28+-12054.5%40++18335.3%50++31124.3%60++50416.6%70++79011.2%80++11807.8%
Benjamin BrahmerPSUReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 30 ydsPSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct14% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31075.6%25+-13757.8%26+-11854.1%27+-11854.1%40++18135.6%50++30025%60++48417.1%70++76011.6%80++11607.9%
Andrew MarshMICHAnytime TD
35.7% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production back price steady
Over+18035.7%
Andrew RappleyeaPSUAnytime TD
16.7% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+50016.7%
Benjamin BrahmerPSUAnytime TD
27% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production backbet up +295 → +270
Over+27027%
Brett EskildsenPSUAnytime TD
23.3% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production backdrifted +295 → +330
Over+33023.3%
Bryce UnderwoodMICHAnytime TD
58.3% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backdrifted -165 → -140
Over-14058.3%
Bryson KuzdzalMICHAnytime TD
12.5% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production back price steady
Over+70012.5%
Cam WallacePSUAnytime TD
20% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+40020%
Carson HansenPSUAnytime TD
37.7% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+16537.7%
Channing GoodwinMICHAnytime TD
7.7% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production back price steady
Over+12007.7%
Chase SowellPSUAnytime TD
29.4% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production backdrifted +215 → +240
Over+24029.4%
Hogan HansenMICHAnytime TD
15.4% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backbet up +1000 → +550
Over+55015.4%
Jalen HoffmanMICHAnytime TD
10.5% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production back price steady
Over+85010.5%
James PeoplesPSUAnytime TD
32.8% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+20532.8%
JJ BuchananMICHAnytime TD
42.6% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backbet up +155 → +135
Over+13542.6%
Jordan MarshallMICHAnytime TD
52.4% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backdrifted -130 → -110
Over-11052.4%
Karon BrookinsPSUAnytime TD
6.3% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+15006.3%
Michigan D/STAnytime TD
18.2% to score price steady
Over+45018.2%
Penn State D/STAnytime TD
15.4% to score price steady
Over+55015.4%
Quinton MartinPSUAnytime TD
22.7% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+34022.7%
Rocco BechtPSUAnytime TD
23.8% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production backbet up +350 → +320
Over+32023.8%
Ryan Barkerfgm
price steady
2++14540.8%
Salesi MoaMICHAnytime TD
9.5% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backbet up +1200 → +950
Over+9509.5%
Savion HiterMICHAnytime TD
46.5% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backdrifted +100 → +115
Over+11546.5%
Travis JohnsonMICHAnytime TD
8.3% to scoreMICH implied 24.5 pts · favouredPenn State D was middling — 55th pct69% of overall production backbet up +1400 → +1100
Over+11008.3%
Trey Butkowskifgm
price steady
2++13043.5%
Zay RobinsonPSUAnytime TD
13.3% to scorePSU implied 18 pts · underdogMichigan D was middling — 43th pct8% of overall production back price steady
Over+65013.3%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.