College Player Props

Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.

No hit rates here, on purpose

We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.

These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.

Pittsburgh vs Boston College

Sat 12:00 PM ETtotal 42.540 props

Mason McKenzieBCPassing yards
market midpoint ≈ 205 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct8% of passing production backdrifted -117 → -102
150+-31175.7%160+-24671.1%170+-19566.1%180+-15660.9%190+-12755.9%191+-11954.3%192+-11753.9%193+-11854.1%194+-11653.7%195+-11553.5%196+-11653.7%200+-10250.5%201+-11553.5%210++12045.5%220++14940.2%230++18635%240++23230.1%250++28725.8%260++35621.9%270++45118.1%280++58114.7%290++73012%300++9309.7%310++11607.9%
Damon Ferguson Jr.PITTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 62 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct67% of rushing production backbet up +144 → -111
15+-300096.8%20+-230095.8%25+-116092.1%30+-70087.5%40+-32576.5%49+-12856.1%50+-17864%51+-11453.3%54+-11653.7%55+-11453.3%59+-12555.6%60+-11152.6%70++13842%80++20532.8%90++28825.8%100++40619.8%110++55515.3%120++76011.6%130++10408.8%
Mason McKenzieBCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 57 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct-62% of rushing production back price steady
15+-300096.8%20+-154093.9%25+-83089.2%30+-51383.7%40+-24571%48+-12655.8%49+-12054.5%50+-13858%51+-11653.7%52+-12555.6%53+-12755.9%54+-11353.1%60++11646.3%70++17935.8%80++26727.2%90++38620.6%100++55515.3%110++78011.4%120++10808.5%
Carson KentPITTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 37 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-46482.3%25+-19065.5%32+-11854.1%33+-11453.3%34+-11653.7%35+-11653.7%36+-11453.3%40++13642.4%50++22830.5%60++36421.6%70++54615.5%80++82010.9%90++12007.7%100++12607.4%
Cataurus HicksPITTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 51 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-176094.6%25+-54384.4%40+-18164.4%46+-12755.9%47+-11854.1%48+-11753.9%50+-10651.5%60++14840.3%70++22730.6%80++33722.9%90++48117.2%100++68012.8%110++9409.6%120++12807.2%
Jaedn SkeeteBCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct23% of receiving production back price steady
15+-31075.6%25+-13557.4%26+-11653.7%27+-11854.1%33+-11453.3%34+-11353.1%35+-11553.5%40++18435.2%50++30224.9%60++48817%70++76011.6%80++11607.9%90++11807.8%
La'Vell WrightPITTRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 52 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct67% of rushing production backbet up +101 → -111
15+-240096%20+-108091.5%25+-59885.7%30+-38779.5%40+-19466%47+-12956.3%50+-11152.6%60++14441%70++22131.2%80++33423%90++48917%100++69012.7%110++9909.2%
Evan DickensBCRushing yards
market midpoint ≈ 28 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct-62% of rushing production backbet up +129 → +118
10+-67087%15+-32176.2%20+-18965.4%23+-12455.4%24+-12455.4%25+-12355.2%26+-12255%30++11845.9%40++21831.4%50++37721%60++61014.1%70++9709.3%
Javarius GreenBCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 41 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct23% of receiving production backbet up +108 → -104
15+-62086.1%25+-28574%33+-11453.3%34+-11453.3%35+-13256.9%36+-11453.3%40+-10451%50++16537.7%60++26727.2%70++41119.6%80++59914.3%90++83010.8%
Malik KnightPITTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 36 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-51583.7%25+-20266.9%32+-12555.6%33+-11353.1%34+-11553.5%40++12744.1%50++21032.3%60++33223.1%70++51416.3%80++77011.5%90++11408.1%
Dawson PoughBCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 22 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct23% of receiving production back price steady
15+-17763.9%18+-12755.9%19+-11653.7%20+-11753.9%25++12245%40++31124.3%50++53915.6%60++88010.2%70++12807.2%
Censere LeePITTReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 26 ydsPITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct24% of receiving production back price steady
15+-24170.7%23+-11854.1%24+-11553.5%25+-10851.9%40++23230.1%50++39220.3%60++63013.7%70++9609.4%
Johnathan MontagueBCReceiving yards
market midpoint ≈ 22 ydsBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct23% of receiving production back price steady
15+-17563.6%18+-12956.3%19+-12856.1%20+-11653.7%25++12444.6%40++30624.6%50++51316.3%60++85010.5%
Antonio Chadhafgm
price steady
2++14540.8%
Bo MacCormackBCAnytime TD
16.7% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production backdrifted +450 → +500
Over+50016.7%
Boston College D/STAnytime TD
18.2% to scorebet up +500 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Brady CloughBCAnytime TD
11.1% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+80011.1%
Bryce YatesPITTAnytime TD
20% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +320 → +400
Over+40020%
Carson KentPITTAnytime TD
20% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +350 → +400
Over+40020%
Cataurus HicksPITTAnytime TD
32.3% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +165 → +210
Over+21032.3%
Censere LeePITTAnytime TD
31.3% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +165 → +220
Over+22031.3%
Damon Ferguson Jr.PITTAnytime TD
56.5% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over-13056.5%
Danny EdgehilleBCAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Dawson PoughBCAnytime TD
17.4% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+47517.4%
Demetrice McCrayPITTAnytime TD
11.8% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Elijah LaggPITTAnytime TD
13.3% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +500 → +650
Over+65013.3%
Evan DickensBCAnytime TD
44.4% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production backdrifted +110 → +125
Over+12544.4%
Holden GerinerPITTAnytime TD
11.8% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Ja'Kyrian TurnerPITTAnytime TD
38.5% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+16038.5%
Jaedn SkeeteBCAnytime TD
14.3% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+60014.3%
Javarius GreenBCAnytime TD
27% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+27027%
Johnathan MontagueBCAnytime TD
20% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+40020%
La'Vell WrightPITTAnytime TD
45.5% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production back price steady
Over+12045.5%
Landon WrightBCAnytime TD
11.8% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production back price steady
Over+75011.8%
Luca Lombardofgm
price steady
2++14041.7%
Malik KnightPITTAnytime TD
18.2% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +230 → +450
Over+45018.2%
Mason McKenzieBCAnytime TD
53.5% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production backdrifted -140 → -115
Over-11553.5%
Pittsburgh D/STAnytime TD
20.8% to score price steady
Over+38020.8%
Tony KinslerPITTAnytime TD
11.8% to scorePITT implied 24.5 pts · favouredBoston College D was middling — 40th pct40% of overall production backdrifted +650 → +750
Over+75011.8%
Zeke MooreBCAnytime TD
10% to scoreBC implied 18 pts · underdogPittsburgh D was tough — 93th pct16% of overall production backdrifted +600 → +900
Over+90010%

Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.