College Player Props
Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.
No hit rates here, on purpose
We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.
These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.
Western Michigan vs Central Michigan
Sat 1:30 PM ETtotal 42.523 props- Adam ParksWMUAnytime TD11.8% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Angel FloresCMUAnytime TD65.5% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Aveion ChenaultWMUAnytime TD21.7% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Baylin BrooksWMUAnytime TD25.3% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Braylen NavesCMUAnytime TD11.1% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Broc LowryWMUAnytime TD63.6% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Brock TownsendCMUAnytime TD16.7% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Central Michigan D/STAnytime TD15.4% to score price steady
- Cole CabanaWMUAnytime TD16.7% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Egypt NelsonWMUAnytime TD21.3% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Emazon LittlejohnWMUAnytime TD11.8% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Harper HughesWMUAnytime TD10.5% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Jalen BuckleyWMUAnytime TD65.5% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Jayden ClerveauxCMUAnytime TD27% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Justin RuffinCMUAnytime TD19% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Langston LewisCMUAnytime TD21.7% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Myles PetersCMUAnytime TD10.5% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Nasir WilliamsCMUAnytime TD13.3% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Nate LevickiWMUAnytime TD11.8% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Nick WoodfordCMUAnytime TD21.3% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Ofa MataeleWMUAnytime TD35.7% to scoreWMU implied 24.8 pts · favouredCentral Michigan D was middling — 65th pct100% of overall production back price steady
- Vaughn BlueCMUAnytime TD32.8% to scoreCMU implied 17.8 pts · underdogWestern Michigan D was tough — 88th pct54% of overall production back price steady
- Western Michigan D/STAnytime TD16.7% to score price steady
Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.