College Player Props
Books post college props game by game in the days before kickoff, so this fills in as the week goes. Right now: 1169 players across 49 games.
No hit rates here, on purpose
We hold no college player game logs, so any “hits 7 of his last 10” we put here would be invented. What we can show is real: what the ladder implies, the points the game line hands that offence, what the opposing defence did last season, and how much of that production actually returns.
These are milestone ladders, not over/unders.
Wake Forest vs California
Sat 10:30 PM ETtotal 53.535 props- Gio LopezWAKEPassing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 270 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct23% of passing production backdrifted -111 → +102150+-210095.5%160+-148093.7%170+-110091.7%180+-83089.2%190+-64086.5%200+-48983%210+-37979.1%220+-30175.1%230+-23870.4%240+-18865.3%250+-15160.2%260+-12054.5%261+-11653.7%262+-11553.5%263+-11553.5%264+-11954.3%265+-11954.3%267+-11753.9%268+-11753.9%269+-11653.7%270++10249.5%280++12544.4%290++15539.2%300++19234.2%310++23729.7%320++29125.6%330++35721.9%340++45418.1%350++57614.8%360++72012.2%370++9109.9%380++11607.9%390++12607.4%
- Carlos HernandezWAKEReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 106 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production back price steady
- Deuce LawrenceWAKERushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 49 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production backdrifted -119 → -105
- Ty Clark IIIWAKERushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 59 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production backbet up +114 → +104
- Jack FoleyWAKEReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 54 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production backdrifted -126 → -111
- Chase HendricksCALReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 58 ydsCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production backbet up +134 → +109
- Ian StrongCALReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 71 ydsCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production backbet up +103 → -104
- Gio LopezWAKERushing yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 30 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct5% of rushing production back price steady
- Antonio MeeksWAKEReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 25 ydsWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct13% of receiving production backdrifted -107 → +114
- Mason MiniCALReceiving yardsmarket midpoint ≈ 32 ydsCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct43% of receiving production back price steady
- Adam MohammedCALAnytime TD43.5% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production backdrifted +120 → +130
- Anthony LeagueCALAnytime TD20.4% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Antonio MeeksWAKEAnytime TD20.4% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Ashten EmoryCALAnytime TD50% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- California D/STAnytime TD16.7% to score price steady
- Carlos HernandezWAKEAnytime TD50% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Chase HendricksCALAnytime TD41.7% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Connor Calvertfgmprice steady
- Cooper PerryCALAnytime TD19% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Deuce LawrenceWAKEAnytime TD58.3% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Drayden DickmannWAKEAnytime TD16.7% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Gio LopezWAKEAnytime TD71% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Ian StrongCALAnytime TD38.5% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Jack FoleyWAKEAnytime TD29% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Jackson BrousseauCALAnytime TD12.5% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Jamar SearcyWAKEAnytime TD21.7% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Jordan KingCALAnytime TD19% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Kam ShanksWAKEAnytime TD24.4% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Kamrean JohnsonWAKEAnytime TD12.5% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Kyion GrayesCALAnytime TD18.2% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Mason MiniCALAnytime TD27% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Taimane PurcellCALAnytime TD15.4% to scoreCAL implied 21.8 pts · underdogWake Forest D was tough — 95th pct58% of overall production back price steady
- Ty Clark IIIWAKEAnytime TD57.4% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
- Wake Forest D/STAnytime TD18.2% to score price steady
- Will LoerzelWAKEAnytime TD13.3% to scoreWAKE implied 31.8 pts · favouredCalifornia D was middling — 43th pct14% of overall production back price steady
Prices are DraftKings, refreshed every 30 minutes; tap any rung to send it to your betslip. We publish no model or pick on college player props — our own measurement says this sport is efficiently priced, and every spread band we tested lands at a coin flip. This board is here so you can read the market, not so we can beat it.